TY - JOUR
T1 - Classes of communication and the conditions for their evolution
AU - Tamura, Kohei
AU - Ihara, Yasuo
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Kenichi Aoki and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This research was supported in part by Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology , Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists(B), 18770217 .
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Evolution of communication is conceptualized as a coevolutionary process in which evolution of signaler and that of receiver occur in an interdependent manner. Three classes of communication, mutualistic, altruistic, and exploiting, are distinguished depending on who gains a benefit or suffers a cost from successful communication. Communication is also dichotomized according to whether individuals are innately able to send and receive relevant signals or they have to acquire those signals culturally. We develop two-locus haploid models that represent the coevolutionary nature of the evolution of communication, and derive the conditions under which communicators can invade a population of non-communicators and those under which a population of communicators is evolutionarily stable against the invasion by non-communicators for each of the three classes of communication. Analysis of the models reveals that interaction among siblings enables the invasion of communication and that the optimal probability of interaction with siblings depends on the class of communication and the mode of signal transmission. In addition, cultural exploiting communication is more likely to invade a population of non-communicators than is genetic exploiting communication under certain circumstances.
AB - Evolution of communication is conceptualized as a coevolutionary process in which evolution of signaler and that of receiver occur in an interdependent manner. Three classes of communication, mutualistic, altruistic, and exploiting, are distinguished depending on who gains a benefit or suffers a cost from successful communication. Communication is also dichotomized according to whether individuals are innately able to send and receive relevant signals or they have to acquire those signals culturally. We develop two-locus haploid models that represent the coevolutionary nature of the evolution of communication, and derive the conditions under which communicators can invade a population of non-communicators and those under which a population of communicators is evolutionarily stable against the invasion by non-communicators for each of the three classes of communication. Analysis of the models reveals that interaction among siblings enables the invasion of communication and that the optimal probability of interaction with siblings depends on the class of communication and the mode of signal transmission. In addition, cultural exploiting communication is more likely to invade a population of non-communicators than is genetic exploiting communication under certain circumstances.
KW - Animal signals
KW - Communication
KW - Cultural evolution
KW - Gene-culture coevolution
KW - Learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955466718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955466718&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.03.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 21397621
AN - SCOPUS:79955466718
SN - 0040-5809
VL - 79
SP - 174
EP - 183
JO - Theoretical Population Biology
JF - Theoretical Population Biology
IS - 4
ER -