Abstract
Although evolutionary game theory has been popular in social sciences, we have seldom checked its utility as a tool in sociology. In this paper I argue that evolutionary game theory is a good tool with which we study evolution of certain types of social order, but that it has a limitation when we apply it to the study of evolution of the division of labor. To prove the argument, I first adopt a working definition of social order as a self-enforcing relationship between action and expectation. Then I adopt the fictitious play and best reply assumptions rather than the hardwired strategy and replicator dynamics assumptions, because the former are fitter for analysis of the self-enforcing relationship. Third, I claim that the core of the division of labor is the creation of new roles and build an evolutionary game theoretic framework of evolution of the division of labor. Finally, I point out that a limitation of evolutionary game theory in the study of evolution of the division of labor as social order is that it assumes a finite set of possible actions, while evolution of the division of labor accompanies new actions. This limitation, however, shows us where to attack to make a breakthrough.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 185-196 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Sociological Theory and Methods |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2003 Dec 1 |
Keywords
- Division of labor
- Evolutionary game theory
- Social order
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science