TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized controlled trial of surgery and postoperative modified FOLFOX6 versus surgery and perioperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable colorectal liver metastases
T2 - EXPERT study
AU - Matsumura, Masaru
AU - Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
AU - Oba, Masaru
AU - Yamaguchi, Kensei
AU - Uetake, Hiroyuki
AU - Yoshino, Takayuki
AU - Morita, Satoshi
AU - Takahashi, Keiichi
AU - Unno, Michiaki
AU - Shimada, Yasuhiro
AU - Muro, Kei
AU - Matsuhashi, Nobuhisa
AU - Mori, Masaki
AU - Baba, Hideo
AU - Shimada, Mitsuo
AU - Mise, Yoshihiro
AU - Kawaguchi, Yoshikuni
AU - Kagimura, Tatsuo
AU - Ishigure, Kiyoshi
AU - Saiura, Akio
AU - Sugihara, Kenichi
AU - Kokudo, Norihiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation in Kobe, Japan as trial data center. The authors would like to thank Enago ( www.enago.jp ) for the English language review.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Purpose: To clarify the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for the patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), we conducted a multicenter randomized phase III trial to compare surgery followed by postoperative FOLFOX regimen with perioperative FOLFOX regimen plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable CLM. Methods: Patients who had KRAS wild-type resectable CLM having one to eight liver nodules without extrahepatic disease were randomly assigned to the postoperative chemotherapy group, wherein up-front hepatectomy was performed followed by 12 cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6, and the perioperative chemotherapy group (experimental), wherein six cycles of preoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab were performed followed by hepatectomy and six cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: There were 37 patients in postoperative chemotherapy group and 40 patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group who were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The PFS and overall survival (OS) showed no significant difference (PFS, hazard ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval 0.69–2.01], P = 0.539: OS, 1.03 [0.46–2.29], P = 0.950). In the postoperative chemotherapy group, 35.1% had a 3-year PFS, and 86.5% had a 3-year OS. Meanwhile, in the perioperative chemotherapy group, 30.0% had a 3-year PFS, and 74.4% had a 3-year OS. Conclusion: There was no difference in survival found between the group of the perioperative chemotherapy plus cetuximab and that of the postoperative chemotherapy in the cohort of our study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000007787).
AB - Purpose: To clarify the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for the patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), we conducted a multicenter randomized phase III trial to compare surgery followed by postoperative FOLFOX regimen with perioperative FOLFOX regimen plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable CLM. Methods: Patients who had KRAS wild-type resectable CLM having one to eight liver nodules without extrahepatic disease were randomly assigned to the postoperative chemotherapy group, wherein up-front hepatectomy was performed followed by 12 cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6, and the perioperative chemotherapy group (experimental), wherein six cycles of preoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab were performed followed by hepatectomy and six cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: There were 37 patients in postoperative chemotherapy group and 40 patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group who were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The PFS and overall survival (OS) showed no significant difference (PFS, hazard ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval 0.69–2.01], P = 0.539: OS, 1.03 [0.46–2.29], P = 0.950). In the postoperative chemotherapy group, 35.1% had a 3-year PFS, and 86.5% had a 3-year OS. Meanwhile, in the perioperative chemotherapy group, 30.0% had a 3-year PFS, and 74.4% had a 3-year OS. Conclusion: There was no difference in survival found between the group of the perioperative chemotherapy plus cetuximab and that of the postoperative chemotherapy in the cohort of our study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000007787).
KW - Cetuximab
KW - Perioperative chemotherapy
KW - Resectable colorectal liver metastases
KW - a Multicenter-randomized controlled study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125146752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125146752&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00423-022-02434-7
DO - 10.1007/s00423-022-02434-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 35211831
AN - SCOPUS:85125146752
SN - 1435-2443
VL - 407
SP - 1345
EP - 1356
JO - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
JF - Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -