A new interpretation on the optimal density regulations: Closed and open city

Tatsuhito Kono, Kirti Kusum Joshi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Optimality of urban density regulations differs between a closed city and an open city. We demonstrate, by examining optimal floor area ratio (FAR) regulation, how to control building size to mitigate traffic congestion externality in a monocentric city. Results show that a closed city requires not only downward adjustment to the market density at boundary locations using maximum FAR regulation but also upward adjustment at central locations using minimum FAR regulation. On the other hand, an open city requires only the former. The common practice of imposing only maximum FAR regulation is thus insufficient for closed cities although it is effective for open cities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-234
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Housing Economics
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Sep

Keywords

  • Congestion
  • Externalities
  • Floor area ratio
  • Urban growth boundary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A new interpretation on the optimal density regulations: Closed and open city'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this